The first IAventure white paper is now available. Sign up and we'll send you a personalized mailing.
1. Algorithmic justiceComparative study France USA
Adapted version of the Master's thesis in Criminal Law and Procedure by Léa Grima, student member of the Paris staff.
"Algorithmic Justice" is an in-depth comparative study between France and the United States, focusing on the emerging concept of predictive justice. In this book, Léa Grima explores the implications of using algorithms and artificial and artificial intelligence in the justice system, highlighting the challenges and challenges and opportunities associated with this new approach.
Find out about the challenges of predictive justice in France and the United States? How the influenced by algorithms? What are the implications in terms of respect for fundamental rights and transparency?
This white paper offers a clear and nuanced perspective on the complex subject of algorithmic justice, providing comparative analyses of the two countries' legal systems and recommendations for the ethical and balanced use of predictive technologies.
We would like to thank Léa Grima for her outstanding work and significant contribution to this comparative study. Her expertise and passion for predictive justice is evident in every page of this white paper.
2. French criminal liability Applied to generative artificial intelligence
By Léa Grima, Corporate Criminal Lawyer at the Paris Bar Paris Bar.
"I need your clothes, your boots, and Your Motorcycle!" orders the T800/850 to the biker he meets on his way.
Refusing to submit to this creature straight from the from the future, a fight breaks out, from which the robot emerges triumphant.
If the cinephile is fascinated by the film's overflowing science fiction of this film, the criminal lawyer will wonder who was responsible for this robbery aggravated by the violence of the humanoid. Visit be held accountable for his actions?
Is the programmer the real culprit, or is it the user? user? Such is the question of criminal liability in the face of offences committed through intelligence intelligence (AI).
It is becoming imperative to rethink and adapt our legal framework to better respond to the specificities of artificial intelligence technologies. Consideration could be given to developing a hybrid liability regime, taking into account both both the actions and negligence of designers and users, while at the same time and users, while at the same time remedying any lack of understanding of the system by legislation.